Greenpeace's ruling has brought a wave of solidarity against SLAPP lawsuits designed to silence climate campaigners ...
3h
WhoWhatWhy on MSNJury Says Greenpeace Owes $660M in Damages for Dakota Pipeline ProtestPICKS are stories from many sources, selected by our editors or recommended by our readers because they are important, ...
Amnesty International warned against a 'chilling verdict' returned by a North Dakota jury on Thursday in a lawsuit against Greenpeace. The verdict orders Greenpeace, an environmental advocacy ...
Environmental group found to have defamed Energy Transfer through protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation and other claims in connection with protests against an oil ...
The lawsuit, filed by Energy Transfer Partners, claimed that the negative publicity aroused by the pipeline protests more than a decade ago has cost the company more than $300 million.
Jury decides Greenpeace should pay more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer Partners for defamation, trespassing and other illegal actions involving protests against the pipeline.
The March 19 ruling from a jury in North Dakota sets a chilling precedent that could erode protest rights in the US.
Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing them to pay $660 million in damages for their protest efforts ...
Climate advocacy group, 350.org, says it stands in full solidarity with Greenpeace as it appeals the devastating legal ruling ...
In a win for the oil and gas pipeline company Energy Transfer, a nine-person North Dakota jury found the environmental group ...
Greenpeace said its activism will never stop despite a North Dakota jury ordering the organization to pay more than $660 million in damages for defamation and other claims related to protests against ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results