Feb 3, 2014 · Hey @JaberAlNahian, that is actually a completely different scenario than the asked question. In the solution above, since both functions is within the same scope, I would set an let executed = false-flag, and wrap the first function into a setTimeout(); if executed not is true when timeout is met, execute next(), and set executed to true ..

In obsolete environments without module support, wrap your code in a scoping function and use variables local to that scoping function, and make your other functions closures within it: <script> (function() { // Begin scoping function var yourGlobalVariable; // Global to your code, invisible outside the scoping function function foo() { // ...

Inside an async scope (i.e. an async function), you can use the "await" keyword to wait for a Promise to resolve before continuing to the next line of the function. This is functionally equivalent to putting the lines after await into the setTimeout callback and not using async/await at all.

May 19, 2016 · I need to add a delay of about 100 miliseconds to my Javascript code but I don't want to use the setTimeout function of the window object and I don't want to use a busy loop. Does anyone have any

Oct 3, 2012 · once Function (a… → b) → (a… → b) PARAMETERS Added in v0.1.0. Accepts a function fn and returns a function that guards invocation of fn such that fn can only ever be called once, no matter how many times the returned function is invoked. The first value calculated is returned in subsequent invocations.

You can also use this code to show/hide elements: document.getElementById(id).style.visibility = "hidden"; document.getElementById(id).style.visibility = "visible";

Feb 3, 2012 · JavaScript function to make asynchronous code blocking. 0. NodeJS, BlueBird - Wait for Promise to Resolve ...

window.onload = function() { yourFunction(param1, param2); }; This binds onload to an anonymous function, that when invoked, will run your desired function, with whatever parameters you give it. And, of course, you can run more than one …

Apr 8, 2015 · If I have a global variable foo and I define it again in a function with var they will be separate. var foo = 123; (function(){ var foo = 987; //this foo is separate from the above foo }).call(this); If you do have a "wrapper" and you want to define a …

In many cases, jQuery and other frameworks are sheer overkill for small amounts of javascript and not all javascript code needs to be cross-browser. – Andy E Commented Dec 22, 2009 at 16:11